Об этом документе

Business Weekly — Acharei Mos-Kedoshim 5783

Выпуск: Business Weekly — Acharei Mos-Kedoshim 5783. Темы: не определены автоматически. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #655 | Acharei-Kedoshim | April 28, 2023 | 7 Iyar 5783 ‫לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן‬ CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ STICKY FINGERS ACQUIRING Reuven and Shimon shared an apartment. THE WERDIGER EDITION - ‫ לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל‬- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE “Ketzos (176:1; 260:1) proves from this gemara that only when measured into his legal recourse vis-à-vis the workers who cause damage. Dayanim (Judges) #43 Based on writings of Harav Chaim Kohn, shlita Appeals The halachah is that anyone who can save another person from financial loss — e.g., if he can testify on the behalf of a litigant in a ‫לע"נ ר' יחיאל מיכל ב"ר חיים וזוג' חי' בת ר' שמואל חיים ע"ה‬ case and his testimony will influence the judgment — is required to do so, as part of the mitzvah of hashavas aveidah (see BHI #573). “Actually, Shimon said to put the printer on the floor,” said Reuven, “but I told him that I brought it for him.” A: A business owner is generally not liable for theft or “I normally would expect you to uphold your word,” said Reuven’s father, “but you offered the damages caused by his employees. printer because you thought it was extra; now you still need it.” The exception to this rule is if workers caused damage “But I placed the printer in the apartment with intention that it should be Shimon’s,” said in the process of doing the job for which they were Reuven. If, for instance, someone hired workers to We are learning now in yeshivah about kinyan demolish a wall, and they were negligent and caused chatzer, acquisition through one’s property.” damage when the stones fell, the employer is liable in certain cases (see B.K. However, were the seller to that no one would hire a contractor to do renovations — an effort place the item on the ground of the shared property, the implication is that the in which the existing structure or contents are commonly damaged, buyer does not acquire it through kinyan chatzer. [Nonetheless, Ketzos suggests as

Издание

Business Weekly

Дата

28 апреля 2023 г.

Страниц

2