Об этом документе

Limuday Moshe — Eikev 5784

Выпуск: Limuday Moshe — Eikev 5784. Темы: shabbat_laws, kashrut, family_education, holidays, health_mind, parsha_commentary. Поисковые термины: шаббат, законы шаббата, melacha, hilchot shabbat, שבת, הלכות שבת, מלאכה, кашрут, кошер, kosher, kashrut, כשרות, כשר, воспитание, дети, семья, chinuch, family, חינוך, ילדים. The Nesivos (333:4) maintains, if one rents a house, even if he has made a kinyan [acquisition] on the house and is obligated to pay 1 Personally, on my contract it says: ‫“ – השוכר מתחייב לא להשכיר את הבית לאחר לא את כלו ולא חלק ממנו‬The renter obligates himself not to rent the house to anyone else, neither all of it, nor even part.” ~1~ rent, he has no right to rent it to a larger family. he rented it to a bigger family, then the fair ruling (shuras hadin) is that the extra money should be given to the owner, ‫ – דאיך יעשה זה סחורה בביתו של חבירו‬as how can one do business with the house of a friend?” 2 Personally on my contract it says: ...‫ ובסוף תקופת החוזה מתחייב השוכר‬...‫מתחייב השוכר לתקן את הדברים שהסב בהם נזק ע''י שימוש גרוע ומופרז ואי זהירות‬ ‫ ולמסור למשכיר את הדירה במצב טוב כמו בעת קבלו את הדירה‬- “The renter obligates himself to fix anything which breaks through bad usage, and lack of carefulness … at the end of the rental agreement the renter obligates himself … to give back the apartment in good condition, like it was when it was received.” 3 If by renting the apartment out to a bigger family, the building will become weaker or some other type of damage which is not clearly visible will occur, and the owner won’t be able to demand money for it, then he may have a right to protest, however, normally speaking this is unlikely. Even if the renter pays the owner more money, the Shoel U’Meishiv will agree that its forbidden, as the Shoel U’Meishiv is based on the Shu”t Maharam Bar Boruch, Shu”t Maharach Ohr Zoruah and the Shu”t HaRashbah who hold that if the renter pays for the damage then he can rent it to a larger family, however, in our case the owner clearly writes on the contract “it is forbidden to sublet” therefore, there is no room for leniency. (Parsha Potpourri) 2) The Madanay Asher brings a number of answers to answer up the minhag of the chassidim: i) The Shulchan Aruch (183:11) writes: “If one is walking on the way and eating, he doesn’t need to sit down to bentch, as he won’t be able to concentre”. Rather, they came for me

Издание

Limuday Moshe

Дата

22 августа 2024 г.

Страниц

8

Темы: shabbat_laws, kashrut, family_education, holidays, health_mind, parsha_commentary