Об этом документе

Project Likkutei Sichos — Behar 5784

Выпуск: Project Likkutei Sichos — Behar 5784. Темы: family_education, parsha_commentary. Поисковые термины: воспитание, дети, семья, chinuch, family, חינוך, ילדים, משפחה, недельная глава, парша, parsha, פרשה, פרשת השבוע. The verse introduces his In this case, Rashi could have simply cited departure as follows: the words, “and his children with him,” and “Then he shall leave you; he, and his commented, “from here we learn that his children with him, and he shall return to his master is obligated to provide food for his family and resume the status of his fathers.” children.” (Vayikra 25:41) Why does he need to preface with the The Rashi: question, “If he was sold, who sold his He, and his children with him — Says Rabbi children”? In this comment, Rashi indeed cuts out the preface, “if he was sold” and begins with Thus, Rashi uses the active verb regarding the question itself, “who brought her in?” the children, “who sold the children,” because they can, according to this reading, Why does he include the preface in our be sold. Secondly, from the verse in Mishpatim, Once we have established this premise, we Rashi derives that the master is obligated to can understand why Rashi includes the provide for the slave’s wife and children, preface, “if he was sold.” Rashi is bothered even though the verse never mentioned by the verse’s repetition, “Then he shall children. Which leads to his children sold?” The difference regarding the conclusion that “from here, we learn the children is that the Talmud’s tense that his master is obligated to provide food implies that the children cannot be sold, for his children.” But the verse adds the “are his children even sold,” while Rashi’s seemingly unnecessary “he” because the formulation implies that the children can master’s obligation to feed the slave himself technically be sold, “who sold the children.” is also a novelty of this verse. In that case, it is understood that the court will inseparable parts of one essence, and take responsibility for the well-being of the therefore, if the master is obligated to feed man’s wife and children, by stipulating with the father, naturally, that extends to the son the master/buyer that he must provide for as well. If the court is not connected to this The sale of a father and his children alludes sale, then we might assume that the master to exile, as Rabbi Shimon said, “wherever mu

Издание

Project Likkutei Sichos

Дата

19 мая 2024 г.

Страниц

3

Темы: family_education, parsha_commentary