Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Vayikra 5784

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Vayikra 5784. Темы: не определены автоматически. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Vayikro 5784 280  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Must One Pay Off his Mortgage if the Bank that Granted the Mortgage was Acquired by a Jew? The problem you have is that now that a Jew The Avnei Neizer (YD 144) writes that this has become an owner you are the borrower is why the expression used by SA (YD 160, of an interest-bearing loan from this Jew, 1) when he records this prohibition is, "the and you must pay interest to this Jew who borrower who pays." This indicates that acquired the loan. One To fully understand the problem, it is who borrows with interest but somehow essential to determine the nature of the laws manages to avoid actually paying interest on that are violated when one borrows money the interest-bearing loan that he took, never with interest from a Jew. is a statement of Abaye (BM 75B) that a Jew Therefore, the fact that when you borrowed who borrows with interest violates two you did not borrow from a Jew makes no Biblical laws: 1-lo sashich-one must not be the difference now as far as the prohibition of "victim" of (literally-bitten by) an interest- lo sashich is concerned. Thereby the borrower also violates the to stumble by violating a law, whenever, the prohibition of causing the lender to sin in lender violates a law, the one who enabled addition to his own sin of borrowing with him to violate the law violates the second interest. One who borrows with interest Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org thus violates the second prohibition both The author of the Kitsur asked the Shoeil at the time that he borrows and at the time Umeishiv (Kamo: 3, 31) about his ruling and he pays the interest. because once the assets are placed in a pool, The situation where a person borrowed with they no longer belong to the one who placed his interest at a time when it was permitted and money in the pool, but rather they are "owned in the middle of the loan period it became by the pool." (His reasoning is not clear because prohibited to pay the interest occurs also first he says one may rely on breiro even thou

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

22 марта 2024 г.

Страниц

4