Об этом документе

Project Likkutei Sichos — Tetzaveh 5783

Выпуск: Project Likkutei Sichos — Tetzaveh 5783. Темы: chassidus_hashkafa, parsha_commentary. Поисковые термины: хасидут, хасидский взгляд, chassidus, hashkafa, חסידות, השקפה, недельная глава, парша, parsha, פרשה, פרשת השבוע. Purim-Tetzave The Basic Explanation: The Mishnah: By enumerating these dates first, the Mishnah means to assert that they are not Purim is celebrated on the 14th of Adar (in just non-ideal accommodations for those unwalled cities) or on the 15th of Adar (in who cannot hear the Megillah on the cities that were fortified since the time of “proper date.” Rather, these dates are Yehoshua ben Nun). “The Talmudic discussion which clarifies that it Megillah is read on the eleventh, on the was the Men of the Great Assembly twelfth, on the thirteenth, on the themselves who enacted all the dates for fourteenth, or on the fifteenth of the month the reading of the Megillah, both the 14th of Adar….” (Megillah 2a) and 15th, and the earlier dates of These earlier dates accommodate those “accommodation.” who live in smaller villages, who would The Deeper Explanation: travel to larger towns on specific days to supply food and water. These villagers were This notion, that days which are not permitted to advance or delay their hearing considered to be part of the Purim holiday, of the Megillah to those market days, so are nevertheless considered to be they would not have to make another trip legitimate and proper days for reading the to the cities to hear the Megillah. Unlike (“the eleventh, on the twelfth…”) for the other books of Tanach whose composition Thus the Mishnah begins with the reading was Divinely directed, the Megillah was of the villages on the eleventh of Adar, written and canonized only at Esther’s because it expresses this theme of the initiative. This also relates to parshas Tetzaveh which Chassidus explains that the absence of G-d’s is sometimes read on the eleventh of Adar, name alludes to the presence of G-d’s the first possible day for the villagers to essence which cannot be articulated or read the Megillah. Just like the Thus, the Megillah was not composed by absence of G-d’s name indicates His Divine command, nor does it include G-d’s essence, so, too, the absence of Moshe’s name, because it is a communication of His name alludes to the fact that his essence is essence which cannot be defined or present in this portion. found, par

Издание

Project Likkutei Sichos

Дата

26 февраля 2023 г.

Страниц

2

Темы: chassidus_hashkafa, parsha_commentary