Skip to main content
.

Об этом документе

Business Weekly — Naso 5782

Выпуск: Business Weekly — Naso 5782. Темы: holidays. Поисковые термины: пурим, песах, ханука, суккот, yom tov, פורים, פסח, חנוכה, סוכות. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #612 | Naso | Friday, June 10, 2022 | 11 Sivan 5782 ‫לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן‬ CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ SMALLER SIZE, LOWER PRICE? Mechilah (Forgoing) #28 In your case, since your buyer is not trying to nullify the Mechilah of Ribbis Based on writings of Harav Chaim Kohn, shlita sale — and it is obvious that he would never want to cancel it because of the increase in value — you have no ‫לע"נ ר' יחיאל מיכל ב"ר חיים וזוג' חי' בת ר' שמואל חיים ע"ה‬ right to use his complaint regarding the size of the lot as an excuse to nullify the sale so that you can sell it at its Q: Can the borrower forgo the lender ribbis that he charges? — which would occur if the buyer received whatever he “Seemingly, the rationale is that since the borrower gives the additional purchased, and the discrepancy was only in the price — he amount on his own initiative as a gift – there is sincere mechilah, were it not would only have a valid case if the discrepancy was over for the prohibition of ribbis. Thus, while the lender is not allowed to accept a certain percentage, and there would be a time limit for ribbis me’ucheres, – once it was already given, post facto there is not even a filing the claim (Shulchan Aruch 227:7), and onaah doesn’t moral obligation to return it” (Bris Yehuda 8:32-33[110]). As long as that party hasn’t allowed to deposit the large check, post facto you do not have even a moral declared that he wants the sale to stand, and the time limit obligation to return the extra $100.” for complaining about onaah has not passed, the party who perpetrated the onaah is also permitted to nullify the Verdict: Although there is a moral responsibility to return avak ribbis, sale (Rema 227:4, but the Mechaber disagrees). However, regarding such ribbis that was already collected, the poskim may offer that refund, but he may also tell the buyer to write that mechilah of the borrower is valid to exempt the lender from either buy the property at th

Издание
Business Weekly
Дата
10 июня 2022 г.
Страниц
2

Темы: holidays