Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — rabbi fleischman-behaaloscho - borrowed money but is uncertain if he paid back — Behaalotcha 5786

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — rabbi fleischman-behaaloscho - borrowed money but is uncertain if he paid back — Behaalotcha 5786. Темы: не определены автоматически. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Beha'aloscho 5786 379  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Borrowed Money but is Uncertain if he Paid Back Question I have a concession to operate an ATM machine that belongs to a company. account and your friend deposited money in the 1 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org account, even though it was still in your name, position that the Shach (75, 67) maintains is effectively the funds in the account and in the authoritative. Additionally, is important to note that you Since your friend allowed you to use the credit should have known how much you owe since it card and to make transfers out of the account, is not proper to take money without reporting what you did when you made these transactions it to the lender. This is especially so since you knew (or should have known) that afterwards it will be The basic law is a Mishna (BK 118A) that states impossible to determine how much you owe and that if a person says that he borrowed money your lender will have no way to determine how but is uncertain if he repaid, he is obligated to much you took. The Gemara explains that in the case in the Mishna the lender is also uncertain if It is important to note that according to some the borrower repaid and, when the Mishna rules poskim there are situations where beis din can that the borrower must repay, it does not mean obligate one who is uncertain if he repaid, to pay that beis din will force the borrower to repay, the entire amount that he is uncertain about. However, the Taz (ibid) contends that the ruling Furthermore, there are opinions (Mishna of the SA applies only if the lender afterwards Lamelech, Sheilo (4, 1) in the name of the Rashbo, claims that he is certain that the borrower did not who is cited by Ketsos (75, 6) and Nesivos (75, repay. If he remains uncertain, then the borrower 5)) that even if the claimant is uncertain if he does not even have a heavenly obligation to is owed but he is not blameworthy for his lack pay according t

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

29 мая 2026 г.

Страниц

3