Об этом документе

Business Weekly — Va'eira 5783

Выпуск: Business Weekly — Va'eira 5783. Темы: family_education. Поисковые термины: воспитание, дети, семья, chinuch, family, חינוך, ילדים, משפחה. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #642 | Vaeira | Friday, Jan 20, 2023 | 27 Teves 5783 ‫לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן‬ CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ PAYMENT FOR NEGLIGENCE? This means that the primary enable collecting from sold properties THE WERDIGER EDITION - ‫ לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל‬- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE (meshu’abadim), but merely serves as proof of debt by virtue of its being in the purpose of the payment is to ensure that the shomer will lender’s hand. In ordinary cases, in which the shomer is liable for loss and ‫לע"נ ר' יחיאל מיכל ב"ר חיים וזוג' חי' בת ר' שמואל חיים ע"ה‬ theft, it is possible that the payment is primarily for acceptance of liability, and the shomer might therefore be entitled to deduct Q: Are there exceptional cases, in which the defendant is required to go his payment from the amount he must pay for the loss or theft to the locale of the plaintiff? 93b) quotes Yaakov Avinu’s description of the lengths he went to, to guard document that was repaid should not be reused for another loan, even the same day,” Vendor agreements Lavan’s sheep — suffering from scorching heat during the day and freezing temperatures at night replied Rabbi Dayan. Ketzos (48:3) similarly stolen.) According to this approach, even if the shomer does maintains that there is no inherent difference between the witnesses’ not secure the object properly, he is entitled to payment, signature and the borrower’s; it also becomes void upon repaying. signature of witnesses on a loan document becomes void upon repayment, Another difference between these approaches would be no inherent testimony remains about the second loan, whereas when the applicable if the object was stolen, and the shomer sachar must borrower resubmits an IOU to the lender, he obligates himself again, as if now pay for it. He to the first approach, he is not, because the purpose of the considers the date of an IOU irrelevant vis-à-v

Издание

Business Weekly

Дата

20 января 2023 г.

Страниц

2

Темы: family_education