Об этом документе

Business Weekly — Devorim 5784

Выпуск: Business Weekly — Devorim 5784. Темы: не определены автоматически. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #718 | Devarim | Aug 9, 2024 | 5 Av 5784 ‫לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן‬ CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ Part II JUMPING TO PICTURE FOR Mr. It also to wine – seemingly contradicts another ruling of Beis Yosef and Rema based on would seem, then, that the counselor’s determination that the first Rabbeinu Chananel that the implicit understanding applies only to real estate, which THE WERDIGER EDITION - ‫ לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל‬- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE people generally sell only for a clear reason, whereas movable items require an explicit boy, who is a minor, acquired the frog through kinyan dalet stipulation. In the second case, since he didn’t know that he could acquire it through kinyan dalet ‫לע"נ ר' יחיאל מיכל ב"ר חיים וזוג' חי' בת ר' שמואל חיים ע"ה‬ amos, he had no intention of acquiring it until he threw himself on it, so the kinyan dalet amos does not work for him. But if a minor intended to make a kinyan dalet bought wine with the intent of taking it to a profitable locale, but wine prices dropped, amos, the Mechaber (268:4) rules that a girl may acquire it, because he cannot void the sale and return the wine, even if he stated his business intent when the Torah gave her the right to acquire a get (divorce document) by purchasing it. Even the Mechaber agrees that a boy cannot acquire objects through a kinyan dalet amos, because the Torah did not give a boy Tur concludes, though, that Rabbeinu Chananel does not distinguish between the seller the power to effect a kinyan chatzer, upon which the kinyan dalet and buyer, indicating that the buyer can void the sale in Rabbeinu Yona’s case (Beis Yosef amos is based (268:4), and even darchei shalom does not apply if he 207:[32]; Sma 230:15). According to “Based on this, Sha’ar Ephraim (#140) rules in a case like ours that since Rabbeinu Yona and many poskim, he does not acquire it (Pis’chei Teshuvah 198:9, Rabbeinu Chananel dispute whether a buyer of moveable items can void the sal

Издание

Business Weekly

Дата

9 августа 2024 г.

Страниц

2