Об этом документе

Meshech Chochma — shelmikra kitavo 2023 — Ki Savo 5783

Выпуск: Meshech Chochma — shelmikra kitavo 2023 — Ki Savo 5783. Темы: kashrut, parsha_commentary. Поисковые термины: кашрут, кошер, kosher, kashrut, כשרות, כשר, недельная глава, парша, parsha, פרשה, פרשת השבוע. Rabbi Immanuel Bernstein 2023 / 5783 Pshuto PSHUTOShel Mikra SHEL MIKRA From the Teachings of Rav Yehuda Copperman zt”l Parshat Ki Tavo Prohibitions and Declarations ‫ֹלא ָאכַלְ תִ ּי בְ אֹ נִי מִ מֶ ּּנּו‬ I did not eat of it in a state of bereavement (Devarim 26:14) We have discussed on a number of occasions the difference between the Torah’s “own” words, and words it quotes someone as saying (e.g., Lavan, Pharaoh or, lehavdil, Avraham, Yitzchak, and Yaakov). And I am astonished by the Rambam who wrote (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Maaser Sheini 3:5), “One who eats of Maaser Sheini while in a state of aninut receives malkot, as it says ‘‫ — ֹלא ָאכַ לְ תִּ י בְ א ֹנִ י מִ מּ ֶ ּנּו‬I did not eat of it while in a state of aninut’”! Rabbi Immanuel Bernstein Parshat Ki Tavo - Prohibitions and Declarations | 2 words can denote only one of these possibilities, while others can denote either, as follows: Z The word “‫ ”אל‬always connotes a prohibition.6 Z The word “‫ ”אין‬always connotes a negating statement.7 Z The word “‫ ”לא‬can denote either.8 Towards the end of that Shoresh, the Rambam raises the question of our pasuk dealing with Maaser Sheini: However, there is one matter which remains for us to clarify, through which we will have completed our intended discussion in this section, and that is as follows: Whenever the Torah requires that we declare “we have not done such and such,” that action will be enumerated among the negative prohibitions, even though the matter was stated as a negating statement and not a prohibition. Thus, for example, the Torah required us to declare, “‫ — ֹלא ָאכַ לְ תִּ י בְ א ֹנִ י מִ מּ ֶ ּנּו וְ ֹלא בִ עַ רְ תִּ י מִ מּ ֶ ּנּו בְּ טָ מֵ א וְ ֹלא נָתַ תִּ י מִ מּ ֶ ּנּו לְ מֵ ת‬I did not eat of it while in a state of aninut, nor did I consume it while tamei, nor did I give of it for the needs of the dead,” — which implies that each of these acts constitute the violation of a Torah prohibition. We have seen that a halachah d’oraita can only be derived from something which the Torah itself says, since the statements it quotes individuals as saying will inevitably contain a subjective element which renders them incapable of servi

Издание

Meshech Chochma

Дата

1 сентября 2023 г.

Страниц

3

Темы: kashrut, parsha_commentary