Об этом документе
Business Weekly — Vayeira 5783
Выпуск: Business Weekly — Vayeira 5783. Темы: не определены автоматически. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #632 | Vayeira | Friday, Nov 11, 2022 | 17 Cheshvon 5783 לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל WAS THE KINYAN VALID? It has therefore become commonplace for a property that was not intended for rent, for which a person is exempt even if he entered the kinyan to be made with an item belonging to one THE WERDIGER EDITION - לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE without permission. Dayanim (Judges) #20 The Rema rules according to the latter approach, stating that a Based on writings of Harav Chaim Kohn, shlita Additional Aspects of Compromise borrowed item may not be used for a kinyan unless it was lent לע"נ ר' יחיאל מיכל ב"ר חיים וזוג' חי' בת ר' שמואל חיים ע"ה with specific permission to use it for a kinyan (C.M. provide certain things for the kallah, and the “However, we invested a lot of money to build the unit and typically rent it to visitors.” obligation is formalized by means of a kinyan sudar “You’re entitled to charge, but you have to say so up front,” said Mr. He called and asked: the kesubah generally states that the eidim (witnesses) “Are the Greens required to pay for use of the unit?” made a kinyan with the chassan, if no kinyan was “There is a seeming contradiction in the Rema on this issue,” replied Rabbi Dayan. 246:17) cites from Terumas Hadeshen (#317) that if a person tells therefore invalid (Rama MiPano 65, cited in Minchas Pittim, another, ‘Eat with me,’ he can charge the Even Ha’ezer 66:1; see Mishpat Ha’arev, Even Ha’ezer 5, and ‘guest’; we do not assume that he offered to Mishkan Shalom 2:8). beyond the stipulated time – can charge the In commercial transactions, a kinyan suddar is son-in-law, unless there is indication that Vendor agreements effected when the seller lifts an item that belongs he fed with intent not to charge, and only can have clauses that to the buyer, thereby transferring ownership of the afterwards changed his mind and demanded may be ribbis but can
- Издание
- Business Weekly
- Дата
- 11 ноября 2022 г.
- Страниц
- 2