Об этом документе

Business Weekly — halachabizweekly - acharey-kedoshim — Behar-Bechukosai 5786

Выпуск: Business Weekly — halachabizweekly - acharey-kedoshim — Behar-Bechukosai 5786. Темы: family_education, health_mind. Поисковые термины: воспитание, дети, семья, chinuch, family, חינוך, ילדים, משפחה, здоровье, психология, стресс, health, mental, בריאות, נפש. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #555 | Acharai-Kedoshim | Friday, April 23, 2021 | 11 Iyar 5781 Sponsored by Anonymous In Appreciation of the BHI CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ FURNITURE Menashe and Efraim had shared an apartment for the year. however, it is more common for him to immediately take whatever he is offered as payment, and we “When there is a single item that is not divisible, THE WERDIGER EDITION - ‫ לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל‬- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE each party can demand ‘god o agod’ — take or I will take. you can take the eating table.” For the same reason, even if the garden owner “If I had to choose one,” replied Efraim, “I also took the stones, but not in the presence of the wall would prefer the computer desk, so that doesn’t owner, he does not acquire them (Shach 1; cf. “What can we do about dissolving our considered a loan Some explain that the difference between these cases is that a person generally would not partnership in the furniture?” “A partner is entitled to divide at any time, unless and subject to immediately remove bricks from a wall that fell, and the wall owner therefore assumed that it would take stipulated or accustomed otherwise,” replied hilchos ribbis. The Mechaber (Choshen Mishpat 72:26) and the Rema (73:17) rule other, many authorities maintain that each party can demand through ‘god according to the second opinion, stating that the lender does o agod’ that the other party choose one table and settle the differential in not acquire the object immediately, because we assume that value. “There is an opinion,” concluded Rabbi Dayan, “that ‘god o agod’ applies Some poskim write that if the lender wasn’t pushing the borrower only to partners who jointly inherited an item or received it as a gift, but for payment – and certainly if the deadline for paym

Издание

Business Weekly

Дата

8 мая 2026 г.

Страниц

2

Темы: family_education, health_mind