Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Behar Bechukosei-Sold another persons right (1) — Behar-Bechukosai 5783

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Behar Bechukosei-Sold another persons right (1) — Behar-Bechukosai 5783. Темы: не определены автоматически. Our father, in whose name the property was rented (for technical reasons since he was a Russian citizen), based on his knowledge and skill with the help of a lawyer, obtained permission to legally transfer this right to a third party and he then sold the yeshiva’s entitlement to a discounted price to a third party, who then proceeded to buy the property. Answer The issue where a person uses another person’s often and is very delicate so one must be very possessions in order to earn money comes up careful to characterize the situation in a very 1 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org precise manner in order to arrive at the correct person rents out to someone a vacant property decision. In either case the right to consensus opinion (against the Nesivos (148, rent out the property is certainly not ownerless 1)) is that even if an asset only has value for its since if it were, the one who rented it out would owner, it is considered the property of its owner. person works for someone without having been Even though there is a dispute in the Gemoro hired to do the job, he does not have the status of whether the non-koehein can marry a bride with an employee but the status of a yoreid, which has his terumo, nevertheless, the consensus (See its own set of halachos. The issue of his ability to marry a woman who were given permission to work by the with the terumo is a different issue, namely, owner are known as a yoreid bershus, and those whether this right is an intrinsic property of the who were not given permission are known as a food. Since your father was the Furthermore, the fact that the yeshiva did not one who was responsible for making decisions plan to use this right in no way diminishes their for the yeshiva he was empowered and required ownership of this right and it is not considered to act in a manner that was in the yeshiva’s best hefkeir. In this situation where the yeshiva’s 2 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org patron was unwilling to contribute the funds gets paid the amount that would have been paid that would have enabled the yeshiva to use the to an employee, he doe

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

12 мая 2023 г.

Страниц

3