Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Re'ei - Former employee opens a rival firm and woos customers of his previous firm-Part 1 — Re'eh 5783

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Re'ei - Former employee opens a rival firm and woos customers of his previous firm-Part 1 — Re'eh 5783. Темы: не определены автоматически. The Gemoro quotes Rav Huna that 1 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org one may not establish a mill in a movuy which and he placed his bait in a place where the already has a mill, since the second mill will fish would certainly notice it. Halocho is like the latter opinion and in This is exactly what his happening in the general one is allowed to open a second case of a sale, since there is no difference store even in close proximity to an existing between closing a sale and catching fish-in store. Ramban understands that the nature of Rashi, whose explanation is authoritative, the prohibition is that one may not act explains that the Gemoro means that the in a manner that will prevent a Jew from behavior of fish is to swim to the place where realizing otherwise certain profit. The proprietor of the first net difference is that according to the Ramban discovered where the fish were swimming the reason why the profit was virtually 2 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org certain is because the fish already entered – even one fish – the second person's action the first person's net. Therefore, it is hamehapeich bacharoro." The prohibition totally prohibited for your former employee of oni hamehapeich is that if a person is – or any other Jew for that matter – to offer close to earning a profit another person anything to those customers whom you may not intervene and try to get the profit expected to sell to. Tam a second including the Ramo (Res 10., as explained person may try to get the free object even by the Chasam Sofer) and Maseis Binyomin though the first person was reasonably and Chasam Sofer, say that the prohibition is certain that he would otherwise get it. He asks prohibition mazik which is essentially the that since the fish that were being caught same.) were ownerless, Rabbeinu Tam should Moreover, in contrast to many actions that permit the second person to spread out his are only Rabbinic stealing, one who violates net even if that will prevent the first person this prohibition (see Chasam Sofer) is fully from catching them. Even though

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

11 августа 2023 г.

Страниц

3