Об этом документе

Torah Studies — Studies-Pekudei-imp 5784

Выпуск: Torah Studies — Studies-Pekudei-imp 5784. Темы: parsha_commentary. Поисковые термины: недельная глава, парша, parsha, פרשה, פרשת השבוע.    ‫ולעילוי נשמת‬ ‫מרת צפורה יפה בת ר׳ מיכאל וחי׳ שרה ע"ה‬ ‫מושל‬ ‫נפטרה ט׳ אדר תש"פ‬ .‫ה‬.‫ב‬.‫צ‬.‫נ‬.‫ת‬  ‫ולעילוי נשמת‬ ‫ר' אברהם הלל הכהן ב"ר אשר זעליג הכהן וזהבה ע"ה‬ ‫מושל‬ ‫נפטר ג' אדר ה'תש"ע‬ .‫ה‬.‫ב‬.‫צ‬.‫נ‬.‫ת‬  ‫נדפס ע"י בנם‬ ‫הרה"ת ר' דוב הכהן ומשפחתם שיחיו‬ ‫מושל‬   Published by: Reprinted ‫גדולה‬ ‫ישיבה‬-and Redistributed ‫מעיינות‬ ‫להפצת ה‬ by:‫ו ע ד‬   VAAD LAHAFOTZAS HAMAYONOS Melbourne, Australia VaadMelbourne@gmail.com Schneerson Adapted from Chassidic Dimensions PARSHAS PEKUDEI 5784 Pekudei PEKUDEI THE CELESTIAL PAWNSHOP Rashi comments on the opening verse of the portion Pekudei, "These are the accounts of the Mishkan [the 1 Tabernacle], the Mishkan of Testimony..." and notes: "The word Mishkan is repeated twice, alluding to the [first an second] Temple, whose destruction served as collateral [in Hebrew, mashkon] as a result of Israel's sins." Why does Rashi find it necessary to add that the destruction came "as a result of Israel's sins," when the question why "the word Mishkan is repeated twice" is already answered by stating that it "alludes to the Batei Mikdash [the Holy Temples] whose destruction served as collateral"? The primary conception of the Beis HaMikdash is that of "a house for G-d and a gateway to heaven -- the heavenly Beis HaMikdash" ; it is a "place which You, L- 3 rd, made for Your abode," "G-d's permanent residence." 4 5 All these conditions were equally met in the first and second Batei Mikdash; none of them were met in the Mishkan of the desert and Shiloh, which were but "ohalim," "tents" and temporary residences. Since the Batei Mikdash were merely taken as collateral, we understand why Rashi concludes, "as a result of Israel's sins," as this explains why it merely served as collateral: Were the Beis HaMikdash to have been destroyed because it was supposed to have existed only for a limited amount of time, or for some similar reason, then its destruction would have served as its complete cessation and nullification. However, since it was destroyed "as a result of Israel's sins" -- it was the Jews' conduct that brought about the destruction, and not something intrinsic to the Beis HaMikdash itself -- therefore it temporarily ceased to function only

Издание

Torah Studies

Дата

15 марта 2024 г.

Страниц

12

Темы: parsha_commentary