Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Nitzavim-Vayelech 5784

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Nitzavim-Vayelech 5784. Темы: не определены автоматически. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Nitsavim-Vayelech 5784 305  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Switching Causes to Support Question I am Baruch Hashem a successful businessman and have been supporting various causes for many years. The Torah writes (Devorim 21, 17) situation has to be decided individually and what that this entitlement is limited to those assets was true once may not be true today since there that were possessed by the deceased at the time are a number of variables that affect the law. We find in a number of We recall that the Torah requires a non-kohein situations in the Gemara that a kohein or levi who whose animal was slaughtered to give a kohein in the past would regularly receive a person's of his choice the right fore-leg, the tongue and terumo-tithe or other entitlements that the the stomach of the slaughtered animal. double portion is these parts of an animal if 1an Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org animal belonging to a person who regularly gave to a different kohein he is acting as a mechusar these parts to the deceased was slaughtered amono. Even though these In all of the cases (there are 3) where the parts had not been received by the deceased Gemara applies the concept of makerei kehuno kohein prior to his death, his first-born is the recipient was a kohein or levi who regularly nevertheless entitled to a double-portion from received from a certain yisro'eil those items these parts since at the time of his death the which a yisro'eil is obligated to give some kohein deceased was destined to receive these parts or levi. Thus, this Gemara teaches (e.g., Rambam, as explained by Mishna Lamelech us that the first-born is not only entitled to a (Ma'aseir 7, 6)) is that it applies even to the tenth double portion from items that were actually of the crop that must be given to a poor person in possessed by the deceased at the time of his the third and sixth year of the Shmitta cycle and death but even extends to certain assets that even (Shach (YD 257, 11), Chasam Sofer (res. that the reason why the first-born is e

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

27 сентября 2024 г.

Страниц

3