Об этом документе

למודי משה — 331 - chukas — Korach-Chukas 5786

Выпуск: למודי משה — 331 - chukas — Korach-Chukas 5786. Темы: shabbat_laws, family_education, health_mind, parsha_commentary. Поисковые термины: шаббат, законы шаббата, melacha, hilchot shabbat, שבת, הלכות שבת, מלאכה, воспитание, дети, семья, chinuch, family, חינוך, ילדים, משפחה, здоровье, психология, стресс, health, mental. ‫חוקת‬ 331 To receive this booklet weekly via email simply send "subscribe" to limudaymoshe@gmail.com To sponsor a weekly booklet in honor of a simcha, yahrtzeit or any special occasion, or to simply show hakoras hatov, contact me on the same email address or call 0583249052. The gilyon Oimek HaPeshat (gilyon 108, from where the sources for this write-up are from) quotes his father as saying that playing with a Rubik’s Cube on Shabbos is allowed based on the pasuk in Mishlei (26:14): ‫הדלת תסוב על צירה ועצל על מטתו‬ – “As a door turns on its hinge, so does the lazy man on his bed.” A door swinging on its hinges isn’t considered boneh or soser and opening and closing it on Shabbos isn’t considered a melachah. That is why it is the “mother cow who comes and cleans up the mess made by her offspring (the calf).” (R’ Frand) Toiling in Torah ‫זאת התורה אדם כי ימות באהל‬ “This is the teaching regarding a man who would die in a tent.” (19:14) Chazal (Shabbos 83b) teach, “A person should never be absent from the beis hamedrash, nor ever refrain from studying Torah – even at the moment of death. (In regard to the other melachos such as kosev, tzovea and boneh, Rav Fuchs writes that one can be lenient like the other poskim.) The sefer Shabbos K’Halachah (Perek 12, he’orah 233) also takes on like this, and adds: Although some want to permit as one doesn’t intend for the melachah and he is simply playing a game, it doesn’t make a difference as the game is what is forbidden. Since one is showing the talmidim, that itself is borer that is forbidden on Shabbos.” To understand the above we must add some explanation: When it comes to the melachah of borer, if one benefits from the borer immediately there is a heter, so why can’t we say that here? It seems that what R’ Shlomah Zalman is saying is that if one is trying to show his talmidim the forbidden act of borer, then that is borer, as the purpose of the act was the borer, and although one has an immediate benefit from the act, it doesn’t have the same heter as when one separates food for immediate consu

Издание

למודי משה

Дата

19 июня 2026 г.

Страниц

20

Темы: shabbat_laws, family_education, health_mind, parsha_commentary