Skip to main content
.

Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Ki Savo 5784

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Ki Savo 5784. Темы: не определены автоматически. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Ki Sovo 5784 304  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman A Thief who Fooled Himself Question One day I parked my bike near the school I attend. My question is whether there is any problem with my using the seat since, had he known that he made himself a bad deal, perhaps he never would have made the exchange so perhaps the seat really belongs to him and I am not allowed to use his seat without permission. A sale When one takes another person's object of a defective object can be reversed without permission but pays for it there by the buyer since every sale is only are two possibilities: If the victim is made on condition that the object is not happy with the payment the sale is valid defective. The one who took the has the right to invalidate the exchange object in this case is called a chamsan on the grounds that it is a mekach to'us and he does not acquire the object, even since mekach to'us has nothing to do with though he gave the owner the complete blame. Furthermore, besides that even if the seller justifiably had no violating the injunction against stealing, inkling that the item he sold had a defect, the one who took the object violated one nevertheless the customer may reverse of the Ten Commandments: lo sachmod – the sale on the grounds that it is a mekach it is prohibited to covet another person's to'us. One who does not must refund the customer's money even pay in full is a thief (CM 205, 4) even if he though the store is not at fault.) coerced his victim to give him the object Returning to your question whether you since he forced his victim to give him the may use the seat, we must consider the excess value of the object. exchange was done in error since in that The problem with the sale is that your case retroactively the ownership of the seat was damaged in a non-obvious seat that he left you will revert to him 2 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org and as a result you will retroactively have apply this ruling to a situation where used his seat without his permission. If a there is some special reason why

Издание
Torah & Horaah
Дата
20 сентября 2024 г.
Страниц
4