Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Vayetsei - Father Requested to be Buried in Eretz Yisroel and one son Refuses to Comply-Part 2 — Vayeitzei 5784

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Vayetsei - Father Requested to be Buried in Eretz Yisroel and one son Refuses to Comply-Part 2 — Vayeitzei 5784. Темы: family_education. Поисковые термины: воспитание, дети, семья, chinuch, family, חינוך, ילדים, משפחה. Still another example is the Sifrei We note that the interpretation of Rav (Devorim 19, 14) which states that one who Elchonon is supported by the Ramo (CM 210, sells his personal burial plot located in a 3) and Levush who cite this responsum of family burial plot is guilty of violating the the Rashba and use the terminology that the injunction of lo sasig-a prohibition to steal deceased acquired the money. The reason is that his burial plot serves The Mishpotecho Leyakov (11, page 236) to honor his deceased family members who explains that the concept of ownership by a are buried in this plot since it is an honor for dead person is not identical to the concept them if he is also eventually buried there. The Institute for Dayanim And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Vayetsei 5784 263 c Question in Choshen Mishpot d By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Father Requested to be Buried in Eretz Yisroel and one son Refuses to Comply-Part 2 Question We are two brothers and we just finished the shloshim for our father. continuation of the deceased's ownership is We further saw that in order to arrive at this correct, in the case of assets that are needed conclusion it was not necessary to consider to honor the deceased, according to many that the dead person retains ownership of any including the ruling of the Ramo, the assets 1 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org are not even inherited by his heirs. The reason The Rashbo was asked to decide a dispute the Tana Kama disagrees and rules that the concerning a person who gave another person money goes to his heirs is because the money money and told him to use this money to was not needed for the deceased's honor. We see that even donor certainly would not be entitled to the money that was only donated by others for money because it immediately became the the deceased's honor must be used for these property of the recipient by means of zechiyo.) needs, so certainly money that he himself set The one who received the money on behalf aside for this purpose must be used for the

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

24 ноября 2023 г.

Страниц

4

Темы: family_education