Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — rabbi fleischman-tetsave - paid for merchandise with money that is later suspected of being counterfeit-part 2 — Tetzaveh 5786

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — rabbi fleischman-tetsave - paid for merchandise with money that is later suspected of being counterfeit-part 2 — Tetzaveh 5786. Темы: не определены автоматически. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Tetsave 5786 369  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Paid for Merchandise with Money that is Later Suspected of Being Counterfeit-Part 2 Question I own a store that sells paper goods. When the seller later claimed that the merchandise the seller claimed that the money money he received was counterfeit, he was that the customer gave was counterfeit and making a new claim (that the seller must pay the customer did not know if that was correct him genuine money to replace the counterfeit or not. However, we have became liable (einei yodei'a im nischayavti) to consider whether SA's ruling applies in and the other is where the defendant certainly your case since your counter-party was not was once liable and the issue is only if the negligent in not knowing if the money he gave defendant paid (einei yode'a im praticho). full payment and therefore, are not obligated For example, in part 1 we saw that if someone 2 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org is certain that he once owed money and is only is not cbs is that he can argue that he relied on in doubt if he repaid, he is liable. this rule applies even if someone is uncertain Furthermore, if the fact that you noticed that if he borrowed from the claimant's father, maintains that the defendant is not cbs even the bill did not seem genuine is something if the claimant's uncertainty is justified since that the customer should have noticed as well, a person is not expected to be aware of his then it depends on the dispute in SA. the collector’s action was improper, the gabbai In order to decide whether this applies to your is cbs, he must determine how much money is situation it is important to understand the generally collected from the pushkas and give rationale for the two opinions. However, The Sefer Haterumo explains that the reason depending on the exact circumstances, you to maintain that the borrower is cbs is that might be obligated in the heavenly court he

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

27 февраля 2026 г.

Страниц

3