Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Ki Sisa 5783

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Ki Sisa 5783. Темы: family_education. Поисковые термины: воспитание, дети, семья, chinuch, family, חינוך, ילדים, משפחה. The Institute for Dayanim And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Ki Siso 5783 228 c Question in Choshen Mishpot d By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Responsibility to return money borrowed as a child Question Once, when I was twelve years old, I boarded a bus. S’ma note 43) explain Yonah but he makes an exception for the that the authoritative opinion is the Rosh situation where Rabbeinu Yonah’s fear is not that the purpose determines whether the applicable and it is indeed constructive to set loan obligates the minor to repay. it seems that since you borrowed for an Since people will not lend children money essential need you are obligated to repay if they will not be repaid, the Chachomim and were actually obligated to repay right enacted that a child who borrows because away, as soon as you could. The Gemoro who has reached a certain level of maturity (Kesubos 70A) rules that the enactment that (called pe’utos) can legally buy and sell minors can legally buy and sell applies only moveable items, in which case the Gemoro to a child who does not have a guardian. Since when he after a minor sold an item he would be able has a guardian, the guardian can transact on to demand its return with the claim that his his behalf, therefore there was no necessity 2 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org to enact that a minor orphan can himself concerning borrowing money is part of the transact. The Shach just wishes to confine the obligation of a child writes that it is a bit far-fetched that the to repay his loans to those children who Chachomim would enact that an immature can transact business, namely orphans who child can borrow money, even if the purpose have no guardian. Consequentially, point of clarification: even though the Rosh the Rosh would apply it to a situation where only said that a minor must repay his debts for any reason the loan is necessary for the if it was clear at the time that the minor well-being of a minor even if the minor does was borrowing for something essential, not fit into the category of children for whom nevertheless he agrees that if, after the the Chachamim enacted that they can legally minor bec

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

10 марта 2023 г.

Страниц

4

Темы: family_education