Об этом документе

Business Weekly — Chayei Sarah 5783

Выпуск: Business Weekly — Chayei Sarah 5783. Темы: не определены автоматически. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #633 | Chayei Sara | Friday, Nov 18, 2022 | 24 Cheshvon 5783 ‫לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן‬ CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ HUNDRED-DOLLAR MISTAKEN Mr. 12:17) derives from this that if the plaintiff claims a small amount, the dayan party — we do not require the true owner of the THE WERDIGER EDITION - ‫ לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל‬- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE should not rule more than this, even if by law the plaintiff is entitled to more. 28b) states that if a person found something, Based on writings of Harav Chaim Kohn, shlita Affirming a Compromise and two people come to claim it, and they each give simanim (Kinyan) (identifying characteristics) proving that it is theirs, the halachah is ‫לע"נ ר' יחיאל מיכל ב"ר חיים וזוג' חי' בת ר' שמואל חיים ע"ה‬ that it must wait until Eliyahu’s arrival (C.M. According to this approach, since in your case it is impossible “Shach (17:15) and Taz (17:12), indeed, explain that the case of the Rema is that the two sets of parents are part owners of the hundred- where the plaintiff simply claimed a lesser amount, and it is possible that he intended to forgo partially. Other poskim write, however, that the aforementioned Tosafos “Some Acharonim write that even if the dayan is in doubt whether the plaintiff applies only if two conditions are met: (1) one of the sides is being intended to forgo or erred, he can alert him to his rights, but should mention dishonest and (2) splitting the money cannot be a just resolution. because if they did, one of them is being dishonest — and the “Therefore,” concluded Rabbi Dayan, “since March through December is 10 nifkad wants to return the money to whomever it belongs, we months, not nine, we ruled that you are liable $30,000, even though the claim split the sum (Shach 300:5 and 365:3). Verdict: Beis Din should not rule more than the claim when it is possible When the parent added the hundred-dollar bill into that that the plaintiff was willing to forgo some of h

Издание

Business Weekly

Дата

18 ноября 2022 г.

Страниц

2