Об этом документе

Business Weekly

Выпуск: Business Weekly. Темы: не определены автоматически. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #723 | Rosh Hashana | Oct 2, 2024 | 29 Elul 5784 ‫לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן‬ CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ Q. We certainly have no reason to believe that he wanted to forego your obligation to compensate him from your inheritance; even if MONEY MATTERS MONEY MATTERS we assume that a child is generally willing to host his mother as a Yei’ush – Abandonment chessed and for the mitzvah of kibbud eim, we are certain (umdena #5 Based on writings of Harav Chaim Kohn, shlita Yei’ush of a Minor d’muchach) that if she has money to pay her own way, then he had no intention to pay all her expenses in order to enable her to save ‫לע"נ ר' יחיאל מיכל ב"ר חיים וזוג' חי' בת ר' שמואל חיים ע"ה‬ her money so that her other children could inherit it (see Shu”t Mahari ben Lev 1:119 who wrote this regarding a son who invested his Q: I found a loose $20 bill and took it. the simchah hall is rising from $600 to $800, due to My other brothers and I argue that he had provided for her as a mitzvah during greater expenses of air conditioning and cleaning.” those years, and does not deserve more than his fair share of the inheritance. If our price rises, maybe I would go with that hall, but now we’ll lose the $100, If someone benefited another person, even if he did not specify that he wanted which was a non-refundable deposit.” to be paid for it, and even if the beneficiary claims that he thought he was “Was there any mention of a possible price raise?” asked Mr. But if the reason the benefactor was planning to do the favor for free is that he The two approached Rabbi Dayan and asked: thought the recipient couldn’t afford to pay for it, and it turned out that he was “According to which rate must the Blochs pay?” a man of means, then the recipient is obligated to pay (Choshen Mishpat 241:2). Even a partial payment of the rental fee is considered only later did he obtain the means to pay, then the benefactor is not entitled kinyan kessef, and a signed rental contract would be valid as shtar or situmta to payment (Shu”t Zichron Yosef

Издание

Business Weekly

Дата

2 октября 2024 г.

Страниц

2