Skip to main content
.

Об этом документе

Business Weekly — Ki Sisa 5783

Выпуск: Business Weekly — Ki Sisa 5783. Темы: chassidus_hashkafa. Поисковые термины: хасидут, хасидский взгляд, chassidus, hashkafa, חסידות, השקפה. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #649 | Ki Sisa | Friday, Mar 10, 2023 | 17 Adar 5783 ‫לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן‬ CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ PERFECT MATCH? THE WERDIGER EDITION - ‫ לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל‬- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE person is liable only for slight oness, when he should have been more careful, but We see from two vows in the Torah, however, that this assumption not when he took reasonable care. Based on writings of Harav Chaim Kohn, shlita Favors If, however, a person vows to give tzedakah or fast if he does a certain dvar hareshus (an action that is not a mitzvah), and he is not sure that he ‫לע"נ ר' יחיאל מיכל ב"ר חיים וזוג' חי' בת ר' שמואל חיים ע"ה‬ will do that action, it is an asmachta. He mitzvah and accept upon yourself the yoke of Torah and mitzvos, which is the true crown to agreed in theory, but he said that we first had to check your head!” whether Reuven would truly be obligated to fulfill his Nesanel listened attentively to the drashah and happily adjusted his hat. “I’ll have to get Shimon might grant your request, the next question to you a new hat.” address is whether a verbal commitment is enough to “It’s my fault, not yours,” replied Nesanel slowly, obligate a person to fulfill a pledge if he did not make a trying to control his tears. and he pledges to fast or give tzedakah if he fails to do that mitzvah, A: Not only is monetary bribery prohibited, but also doing a favor that the litigant it is not an asmachta (Rabbeinu Yerucham, Toldos Adam v’Chavah, Nesiv 19, was not accustomed to having received beforehand (C.M. Therefore, if the litigant did the Dayan a favor or did a service that the Dayan was According to this opinion, in your case, where Reuven’s intention not accustomed to having received beforehand, or even accorded him a verbal was not meant to commit himself to do another mitzvah, it would courtesy that he was not accustomed to, the Dayan i

Издание
Business Weekly
Дата
10 марта 2023 г.
Страниц
2

Темы: chassidus_hashkafa