Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Matos-Massei 5784

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Matos-Massei 5784. Темы: не определены автоматически. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Matos-Masei 5784 297  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Liability for Damages Sustained by one who Saved Someone from Damage Question I gave someone a ride recently. Answer In order to rule that a person is liable we have to However, one has to be very careful when first find a possible basis for the liability and then applying this basis of liability, since there are determine that the case under consideration cases when one is not liable even if he benefited satisfies the necessary criteria to make one directly from another person's loss. In this case he benefited from your 128, 5 finds more than 30 poskim who rule this locked car which served as a refuge for him from way) is that the borrower does not owe any his potential assailant, and you lost as a result of money to the one who pays his debt. The difference between this benefit and where 1 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org one has to pay for his benefit if it came at he is entitled to reimbursement from the sheep's another's expense is that one has to pay where owner. postulates that one who voluntarily benefits In your situation, as well as the case where a another is entitled to reimbursement only if it was person paid another person's debt, the benefit is reasonably certain that the beneficiary would have that the beneficiary was saved from something, otherwise suffered a monetary loss. Since the monkey 2 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org was ownerless, B, the owner of the wool, is not One point that needs further clarification is that obligated to pay for the fact that his wool has been the damage that was incurred by the car did not improved since he did not take anything from his come from blows that would have otherwise benefactor. By doing so he not only However, probably this difference is not took refuge, but he also he forced you to lock the significant because the damage was incurred at doors because the Torah obligates one to protect the very time that the bike rider w

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

2 августа 2024 г.

Страниц

3