Об этом документе

Hemdat Yamim — 9918-sfile — Acharei Mos-Kedoshim 5786

Выпуск: Hemdat Yamim — 9918-sfile — Acharei Mos-Kedoshim 5786. Темы: family_education, health_mind. Поисковые термины: воспитание, дети, семья, chinuch, family, חינוך, ילדים, משפחה, здоровье, психология, стресс, health, mental, בריאות, נפש. Acharei Mot Kedoshim, Iyar 8, 5786 Closeness and Combat on the Way to the Divine Harav Yosef Carmel After Nadav and Avihu tragically failed to draw close to Hashem through incense, our parasha teaches that the closest man can get to Hashem is the kohen gadol on Yom Kippur. We have seen that the path toward the divinely ordained liberation employs a “reawakening from below.” The halachic claims against mass settlement are rejected by almost all halachic authorities after the foreign mandatory authorities left the Land (see Rav Zevin’s L’or Hahalcha Hamilchama I:7). Although one might thus think that your concern lacks merit, the Magen Avraham (489:2) says: “If he does not understand lashon hakodesh and counted in lashon hakodesh, he did not fulfill his mitzva, as he did not know what he counted, and this is not counting; so it seems to me.” The Mishna Berura (489:5) accepts this ruling. So, while it is wonderful if a rabbi is able to help anyone whose lack of understanding endangers his fulfillment of sefirat ha’omer, it is not a specific issue if that person “leads the tzibbur.” “Behind the Scenes” Zoom shiur Eretz Hemdah is offering the readership to join in Rabbi Mann's weekly Zoom sessions, analyzing with him the sources and thought process behind past and future responses. We daven for a complete and speedy refuah for: Itamar Chaim ben Tzippora Avraham ben Gitel Nir Rephael ben Rachel Bracha Arye Yitzchak ben Geula Miriam Tal Shaul ben Yaffa Ori Leah bat Chaya Temima Neta bat Malka Meira bat Esther Together with all cholei Yisrael Acharei Mot Kedoshim Tuition Payment after Withdrawing Student (based on ruling 85142 of the Eretz Hemdah-Gazit Rabbinical Courts) Case: The plaintiff, an organization led and funded by pl, which operated a school, seeks payment from def of remaining tuition (11,500 NIS). Def counter that they never signed the contract, that the principal (=prn) absolved them of further payment during a phone call with def, and that the school created a hostile environment through a hasty suspension and public badmouthing of def’s son, which made continued enrollment untenable. Ruling: While def never signed

Издание

Hemdat Yamim

Дата

24 апреля 2026 г.

Страниц

4

Темы: family_education, health_mind