Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Naso - Maaseir on Corporate Profits (3) 5783

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Naso - Maaseir on Corporate Profits (3) 5783. Темы: health_mind. Поисковые термины: здоровье, психология, стресс, health, mental, בריאות, נפש. the income of your corporation is really Thus, if a corporation borrows money the your income and there would be no reason lender agrees that the loan only needs 1 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org to be repaid if the corporation itself has we see that by designating an asset as an assets with which to pay the lender. These poskim maintain that since the In order to accomplish this, secular law Torah apparatus for creating limited established a new entity calleda corporation, liability is by designating certain assets as which is viewed as an independent legal an apotekey mefurash, when a corporation entity. The Gemoro (Gittin 41A) writes a borrower designated his gentile slave as that if one borrows money and the lender an apotekey and then freed him, the slave and borrower agree that the only asset that is free and the lender cannot collect his will serve to repay the loan is a specific field, loan. maintains that if a Jew does not have a Thus, we see that even an asset which has personal obligation to repay a debt, the been designated as an apotekey to serve lender and borrower do not violate the prohibition of ribis even if the borrower is as payment for a loan still belongs to its Jewish. Auerbach only become an apotekey if the corporation disagree (See Nesivos Sholom) with Rav borrowed money.) Moshe and rule that such people do violate the prohibition of ribis, they do not disagree We should note that Rav Moshe Feinstein with Rav Moshe’s understanding that also did not view a corporation as an the borrower does not have any personal independent entity as many people liability. Rav Moshe said that to We note further that several leading poskim be a shareholder is not a problem since a (See Bris Yehuda (7, end footnote 66) and shareholder does not have a real say in Mishne Halachos (10, 14)) conjecture that the day-to-day operation of the company. the leniency of Rav Moshe Feinstein applies However, he says that if one is a major only to publicly owned corporations and shareholder and can influence decisions of not to private or personal corporations the corporation he cannot allow Shabbos because essential

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

2 июня 2023 г.

Страниц

4

Темы: health_mind