Об этом документе

Business Weekly — Behaalotcha 5783

Выпуск: Business Weekly — Behaalotcha 5783. Темы: не определены автоматически. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #661 | Behaloscha | June 6, 2023 | 20 Sivan 5783 ‫לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן‬ CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ IS IT TZEDAKAH? Yad) cite a halachah that when lender’s property, though, the Gemara (Gittin someone pledges money to tzedakah, he is obligated to 78b) indicates that even if the lender instructs THE WERDIGER EDITION - ‫ לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל‬- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE the borrower to throw the money to him in a public area, the borrower remains fulfill that pledge and is not allowed to renege. called “kinyan maamad shlashtan.” If, for instance, “Did Levi fulfill his obligation of repaying the Reuven tells Shimon, who owes him money, to give the loan by leaving the money in the box?” Vendor agreements money to Levi, and Levi is present, since all three (the “A person who borrows money remains can have clauses that lender, the borrower — who currently possesses the money liable until he hands it back to the lender or may be ribbis but can — and the recipient) are there, Chazal ordained that Levi acquires the money immediately (Shulchan Aruch, C.M. In the above case in the Gemara, since the victim money in a secure courtyard or the lender’s house is like handing it to him, since a person’s with halachic (who was owed the money) told his assailant (who owed and property acquires on his behalf even without guidance. to tzedakah, and a person cannot consecrate something that is not “Thus, for example, if the lender says, ‘Leave the money under the doormat’ in in his possession (Yoreh De’ah 258:7-8), it was only because Rav Yosef the hall of an apartment building – this is not considered repayment, since the acquired it for the poor that he was not allowed to renege. Had that lender cannot acquire the money in this manner, but rather as mechilah, so that not been the case, then even once the money reached him he would the lender would have to clearly indicate that by doing so the borrower is relieved not have been require

Издание

Business Weekly

Дата

9 июня 2023 г.

Страниц

2