Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Rosh Hashana - Received an Inheritance Based on Secular Law — Ha'azinu 5786

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Rosh Hashana - Received an Inheritance Based on Secular Law — Ha'azinu 5786. Темы: health_mind. Поисковые термины: здоровье, психология, стресс, health, mental, בריאות, נפש. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Ha-azinu 5785 306  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Received an Inheritance Based on Secular Law Question My father was a frum but not very learned Jew. Answer In order to answer your question, it is necessary inheritance, the agent is required to use the to introduce the concept that the Gemara calls money to pay for the daughter's dowry and not mitzvo lekayem divrei hameis-there is a mitzvo to to give it to the heirs. One case in which the Gemara (Kesubos 69B) apples this concept is where a man left money We note that the Rishonim prove from the with an agent with instructions that when his Gemara (Gittin 15A) that this mitzvo applies daughter becomes engaged (eirusin) he should even when the deceased issued his instructions use this money to pay for her dowry. The Rishonim (e.g., Mordechai BB 639, Ran would not have received these funds through Gittin) prove, based on the Gemara (Gittin 40A), 1 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org that beis din forces the heirs (or an agent, if the that Rabbeinu Tam did not require that the possessions are in the hands of an agent) to carry instructions about how to distribute the assets out the expressed desire of the deceased. This opinion maintains 29) who go even further and maintain that the that as long as the deceased gave instructions recipient actually automatically acquires the at any time about who should receive an asset possessions that the deceased commanded that that was held by an agent, the rule of mitzva he should receive, the consensus, and that is the lekayem divrei hameis applies. The basis for all these rule of mitzva lekayem divrei hameis, he rules the opinions is that we find situations where the first approach of Rabbeinu Tam, that the rule Gemara (e.g., Gittin 13A) failed to apply the rule applies when the asset was given to an agent of mitzva lekayem divrei hameis. However, this approach maintains heirs to surrender thes

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

3 октября 2025 г.

Страниц

3

Темы: health_mind