Об этом документе

Project Likkutei Sichos — Metzora 5784

Выпуск: Project Likkutei Sichos — Metzora 5784. Темы: не определены автоматически. says “when an adam/man has a lesion on At the end of the chapter, the Torah the skin of his flesh…” (Vayikra 13:2) The summarizes the previous laws, but noun adam refers to a human being who is according to Rashi’s reading, also introduces refined and elevated. The Alter Rebbe explains that the miraculous “This is the law for one who has a discharge, illness which appears on the skin calls and one from whom semen issues, through attention to a subtle trace of negativity which he becomes unclean” (Vayikra 15:32) which remains in the outermost layers of This is the law for one who has a discharge the person’s soul. flow, and for one who has a discharge, There is the law of the zav, an abnormal whether male or female, and a man who male discharge, and zavah, an abnormal cohabits with an unclean woman.” female discharge outside the expected time And for one who has a discharge — [This of menstruation; and there is the law of the expression refers to] someone who has seen two discharges and someone who has semen issues,” clearly refers to a simple seen three discharges, whose law is seminal emission, which is the most lenient specified above [in the earlier section of this form of discharge resulting in the lowest chapter, beginning with verse 3]. It is not possible for the Thus, verse 32 introduces the law of a case of two zav discharges to be more person who had a zav discharge only once, lenient, or even equal to, the case of the and equates it to a regular seminal emission standard seminal emission. Why does Rashi explain that the Torah is for one who has a discharge” refers to introducing a new law about a single someone who has seen two discharges and appearance of zav discharge after all the someone who has seen three discharges, detailed discussion above? Rashi alludes to his earlier interpretation, Why could Rashi not have explained that according to which it is impossible to verse 32 “and one who has a discharge” separate these two categories, and refers to a zav who saw two discharges, and therefore they must be considered to be alluded to as a set in this verse. 3 when the Torah wants to enumerate all the And this shall be [the nature of] his laws of a particular subject, beginning with uncleanness due to his discharge: [if] his the lenient iteration and moving to the f

Издание

Project Likkutei Sichos

Дата

18 апреля 2024 г.

Страниц

3