Об этом документе

Meshech Chochma — shelmikra reeh 2023 — Re'eh 5783

Выпуск: Meshech Chochma — shelmikra reeh 2023 — Re'eh 5783. Темы: kashrut, family_education, parsha_commentary. Поисковые термины: кашрут, кошер, kosher, kashrut, כשרות, כשר, воспитание, дети, семья, chinuch, family, חינוך, ילדים, משפחה, недельная глава, парша, parsha, פרשה, פרשת השבוע. Rashi is responding, in his way, to the very point that we mentioned earlier—that the issur of “Lo Tevashel” was not placed together with the other maachalot asurim, but rather was mentioned after the concluding words “‫ּכִ י עַ ם קָ דו ֹׁש אַ ּתָ ה‬.” Rashi is bothered by the fact that this mitzvah was seemingly “removed” from being inside the parsha and was placed on the outside! Basar B’Chalav in Chumash Shemot As we mentioned, this mitzvah appears for the first time in Chumash Shemot—a Chumash that does not otherwise contain any discussions dealing with foods that are or are not kosher.1 It appears in the end of Parshat Mishpatim—a parsha that deals mainly with sugyot of 1 [With the exception of the prohibition against consuming “an animal torn apart in the field,” mentioned in Shemot 22:30.] Choshen Mishpat,2 not Yoreh De’ah.3 Specifically, it appears in conjunction with the Shalosh Regalim and Bikkurim! In our opinion, this is the deeper understanding of the Rambam’s words (Moreh Nevuchim 3:36), that one cannot give reasons for the details of a mitzvah, and one who tries to do so “is engaged in one long delusion.” Dynamic Movement within Mitzvot In this case we see that the mitzvah of “Lo Tevashel” has “moved” from the “family” of Avodah Zarah (in Chumash Shemot) to that of Maachalot Asurim (in Chumash Devarim). This informs us that it has not been fully absorbed in the new parsha; rather, it still contains elements of the “root mitzvah,” Avodah Zarah, as indeed we noted above that Chazal applied “a gezeirah to a gezeirah” in keeping with the Avodah Zarah element within the mitzvah that still remains. To this Rashi responds by saying that the intention of the Torah was not to remove it from the first parsha, but rather to connect it to the following parsha of Maasrot, in order to teach us the lesson that Rashi proceeds to quote.13 Rashi’s Concluding Words Moreover, if this approach is correct, it will also help us understand the final three words 11 A classic commentary on Peirush Rashi by R’ Yitzchak Hurwitz of Jaroslaw, Poland. Rabbi Immanuel Bernstein 2023 / 5783 Psh

Издание

Meshech Chochma

Дата

11 августа 2023 г.

Страниц

9

Темы: kashrut, family_education, parsha_commentary