Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Vayikra 5785

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Vayikra 5785. Темы: не определены автоматически. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Vayikro 5785 330  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Asked a Gabbai to Use his Credit Card to Distribute Matanos le'evyonim but the Card did not Work Question We had a case in beis din concerning a wealthy person whom we will call Reuvein and a gabbai tsedoko whom we will call Shimon. Reuvein replied that he will only return the money if he fulfilled the mitzvah of matanos le'evyonim with the money that Shimon laid out from the gemach since the only reason he wanted to distribute so much money on Purim was to fulfill the mitzvah of matanos le'evyonim. and then we will examine if his claim that The basis for thinking that once Shimon 1 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org gave money on behalf of Reuvein, Reuvein However, it is not clear that this works fulfilled the mitzvah just as if Reuvein for mitzvahs like matanos le'evyonim. to marry her, she becomes married to He maintains that this does not suffice that man if the man says to her that he if giving the money is to fulfill a mitzvah is marrying her with the money that since one must perform a mitzvah himself other person gave her. Furthermore, both the Kitsur Shulchan 2 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org Aruch (142, 4) and the Chaye Odom (155, on behalf of his wife – in these cases even 33) rule this way and add that some according to Rav Eliashev the wife fulfills women rely on their husband to give on the mitzvah. their behalf but "it is not proper." Since there is a dispute whether one Modern day poskim dispute whether a fulfills the mitzvah of matanos le'evyonim man can utilize the law of eved Cana'ani for by utilizing the din of eved Cana'ani we a husband to give money to a poor person have to examine if that is what actually on behalf of his wife. (page 132) cites Rav Shlomo Miller as This differentiation is the subject of a maintaining that matanos le'evyonim is dispute between the Ketsos (CM 190, 2) different from pidyon haben since the who maintains that one must still utilize mitzvah

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

4 апреля 2025 г.

Страниц

4