Об этом документе

Project Likkutei Sichos — Eikev 5785

Выпуск: Project Likkutei Sichos — Eikev 5785. Темы: women_modesty, relationships_shalom_bayit, parsha_commentary. Поисковые термины: цниют, скромность, tzniut, modesty, צניעות, шалом байт, брак, отношения, shalom bayit, marriage, שלום בית, זוגיות, недельная глава, парша, parsha, פרשה, פרשת השבוע. RASHI’S PLACEMENT OF COMMENTARY In our parshah,1 when Moshe recounts how he ascended {Mount Sinai} to receive the ‫{ לּוחֹות‬Tablets} from Hashem, the terms “the ‫{ לּוחֹות‬tablets} of stone” and “the ‫{ לּוחֹות‬tablets} of the covenant,” appear several times. [Between these verses, this word appears several times — in verse 10: “And Hashem gave me the two ‫ לּוחֹ ת‬of stone, written…”; in verse 11: “At the end of forty days and forty nights, Hashem gave me the two ‫ לֻחֹ ת‬of stone, the ‫ לֻחֹות‬of the covenant”; in verse 15: “I turned and descended from the mountain… and the two ‫ לּוחֹ ת‬of the covenant were on my two hands”; {and finally} in verse 17: “I grasped the two ‫לֻחֹ ת‬... and I shattered them before your eyes.” Thus, we must conclude that Rashi refers either to one of these specific verses, or {more generally} to the word “‫ ”לּוחֹ ת‬written in its deficient form throughout all these verses.] But evidently, he is not referring to the two instances where the word “‫”לּוחֹ ת‬ appears in deficient form at the beginning of verse 9: “When I ascended the mountain to take the ‫ לּוחֹ ת‬of stone, the ‫ לּוחֹ ת‬of the covenant...” because Rashi writes his explanation of the word “‫ ”לּוחֹ ת‬after his commentary on “And I remained on the mountain,” which appears later in verse 9. 29 | Ekev | Sichah 1 | 2 Perhaps we can answer that Rashi offers this explanation specifically on verse 11 (or 17), where two vavs are missing from the word, “‫{ — ”לֻחֹ ת‬the vav after the ches} and the vav after the lamed — as opposed to verse 9 (or 10) where “‫ ”לּוחֹ ת‬is written with a vav after the lamed. Therefore, Rashi explains that the verse intends to emphasize the deficiency: “‫ לֻחֹ ת‬is written, indicating that they were both equal.” For this reason, Rashi does not explain this in verse 9 of our parshah — “When I ascended the mountain to take the ‫ לּוחֹ ת‬of stone, the ‫ לּוחֹ ת‬of the covenant” — because in this verse the word “‫ ”לּוחֹ ת‬appears both times in deficient spelling. [On this basis we can understand why the aforementioned questions cannot be answered by sugg

Издание

Project Likkutei Sichos

Дата

15 августа 2025 г.

Страниц

15

Темы: women_modesty, relationships_shalom_bayit, parsha_commentary