Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — rabbi fleischman-emor - borrowed an apartment for shabbos which was hit by a missile-part 1 5786

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — rabbi fleischman-emor - borrowed an apartment for shabbos which was hit by a missile-part 1 5786. Темы: не определены автоматически. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Emor 5786 376  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman Borrowed an Apartment for Shabbos which was Hit by a Missile-Part 1 Question Four weeks ago, we borrowed someone's apartment for Shabbos. Answer First, we note that it is correct that one who The Gemoro (BM 96B) explains that the uses someone else's property with permission borrower is not liable for mmm because he has the status of a sho'eil and it is correct can argue that the lender gave it to him to that a sho'eil is liable even for unforeseen use in the manner in which he used it. MMM have been aware of the capabilities of the means that the one who borrowed the item item he was lending and he should not have used it in the matter that he was supposed to, given permission to use the item in a manner but nonetheless the item suffered damage in that was beyond its capabilities. says that since the rationale of the Gemoro is 1 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the rabbanim of our Beis Horaah at www.dinonline.org that since owner was aware of the possibility whether B was required to compensate A for that the damage could happen, it is as if the part of his loss since A's loss was sustained at owner gave permission for the borrower to the time that B was making use of part of A's use it even if it will be damaged as a result of collateral. On the apartment itself you gives is that B never performed an act of definitely do not have any liability since kinyan on A's collateral since he just left it a shomeir (SA 301,1) has no liability for by the gentile and a shomer is only liable if immovable property like an apartment. (340, 1) and Shach ask on the Levush that his deduction is not well-taken since all One reason that you are not liable is based on shomerim including a sho'eil are not liable a ruling of the Maharam of Rottenberg that is for immovable property like a house, as cited by the Mordechai (BM 371) and is ruled we mentioned earlier. Thus three major poskim-the Ramo, 2 Questions in all areas of halacha can be submitted to the r

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

1 мая 2026 г.

Страниц

3