Skip to main content
.

Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Chayei Sarah 5786

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Chayei Sarah 5786. Темы: не определены автоматически. As you correctly noted, in value in the interim it would seem that the problem is that at the time when the the difference between the value of the customer takes possession the value of the property at the time you receive title and purchase will perhaps be higher than the the amount you pay in total would appear amount that the customer paid. Since the money To understand the exact nature of the issue is actually not a loan the issue is only an it is important to note that the time that issue of rabbinic ribbis since the Torah's one is obligated to pay for a purchase is at prohibition only applies to actual loans. The many poskim (see Nesevos Sholom 175, rationale for this exception is because we 4, 15-23) permit prepayment because view what transpired as if the customer we view the payments of the customer actually bought the object that was owned as if he is immediately acquiring a part of by the seller at the time of the payment. The reason this is an act that would serve to acquire the object permitted even though the customer did and even though the customer eventually not really acquire any part of the house at does not receive the object that the seller the time of payment is because the entire owned at the time of payment we consider prohibition is only Rabbinic, therefore, the it as if the customer purchased the object Rabbonon could make an exception if it is that was owned by the seller at the time of possible for the customer to acquire part of payment. Furthermore, the second leniency ruled that not only if the seller owned an that in case there is a market price also equivalent object at the time of payment does not apply because your seller cannot but even if the object has a fixed price a give you any house besides the one that customer may prepay for the object he the you are contracting to buy. The reason you are correct that you must make a this is permitted is because the seller could proper heter issko that all the money that have conceivably immediately purchased you prepay will be used by your seller as on behalf of the customer, the object that an investment on your behalf and not as a the customer eventually will receive and loan. owns the land perhaps, he will agree that Even in case a person buys a house that the payments that you will make prior to al

Издание
Torah & Horaah
Дата
14 ноября 2025 г.
Страниц
3