Skip to main content
.

Об этом документе

Business Weekly — aBizWeekly.2 — Matos-Massei 5783

Выпуск: Business Weekly — aBizWeekly.2 — Matos-Massei 5783. Темы: не определены автоматически. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #666 | Mattos-Massei | July 14, 2023 | 25 Tamuz 5783 Dedicated in honor of the Bar Mitzvah of Nechemiah Werdiger ‫ני"ו‬ CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE ‫לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה‬ ‫לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל‬ STORAGE WOES PROMPT WAGES Shlomo brought his car in for servicing on Friday morning. THE WERDIGER EDITION - ‫ לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל‬- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE “For this reason, if the arrangement is to pay after the month is over, such as 1st in the interim, and it is not due to his negligence, then (in the case of or 10 of the following month, or if the employee or employer first has to reckon th a shomer chinam) the Torah releases him from that responsibility, but what’s owed, some write that there is no violation of bal talin, even if the employer otherwise, he is liable (Shulchan Aruch HaRav, Orach Chaim 443, Kuntres subsequently delays, while others question this” (see Rema 339:9; Sma 339:18; Pischei Acharon 2). Even if the damage “There is a positive commandment: ‘b’yomo titen scharo – on that day shall you pay his hire’ was caused indirectly (grama), for which a mazik (person (Devarim 24:15), and a prohibition: ‘lo salin pe’ulas who inflicted damage) would not be liable, a shomer is sachir itecha ad boker – a worker’s wage shall not liable. The poskim offer two approaches as to why a shomer is liable for grama: For example, one violates them only if the worker asked, or at least indicated, that he expects Vendor agreements One is that there is a gezeiras hakasuv (Biblical decree) immediate payment in the day or night during can have clauses that that a shomer is liable for grama because the owner of which he completed the job, or at the end of a may be ribbis but can the object relied on him to guard it, and he failed to set time period (such as at the end of the week or often be corrected do so (Shu”t HaRitva 199, cited in Beis Yosef 66:41, and Shu”t month). The other approach is that the shomer is liable not not pay immediately – whether in violation of because he w

Издание
Business Weekly
Дата
14 июля 2023 г.
Страниц
2