Об этом документе

Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Terumo - A Deliveryman Accidentally Ruined a Fruit Arrangement — Terumah 5784

Выпуск: Torah & Horaah — Fleischman-Terumo - A Deliveryman Accidentally Ruined a Fruit Arrangement — Terumah 5784. Темы: health_mind. Поисковые термины: здоровье, психология, стресс, health, mental, בריאות, נפש. D iN our site: WWW.dinonline.org.il THE TORAH& INTETNATIONAL BEIS HORAA The Institute for Dayanim HORAAH And under the auspices of Beis Horaah in memory of Baruch and Bracha Gross Terumo 5784 275  Question in Choshen Mishpot  By Rabbi Yosef Fleischman A Deliveryman Accidentally Ruined a Fruit Arrangement Question I sell fruit platters and a customer ordered a two-hundred-dollar fruit platter to be delivered to his parents for Shabbos. is whether he is liable for the damages that you By receiving money for the fruit platter, you incurred and your second question is whether became obligated to give your customer a fruit he is obligated to return the money you paid platter but it only would have become his when him in advance for his work. The Sema (304, 3) claims that an event that was beyond the shomer's control, the Gemoro writes that the enactment was not it would seem obvious that your deliveryman is only that the porters were not liable for damages liable for your loss of a fruit platter and you have but even that the employer must pay them for every right to force him to pay you for your loss. However, the Taz points out that The only reason that there is an issue is due to firstly the Gemoro that says that the employer two sections of the Gemoro that discuss porters must even pay the porters is not discussing and in this article we will discuss one of them. The deliveryman would have the status of a porter Gemoro explains that the reason for this unusual in the time of the Gemoro whether he has to pay exception is that otherwise people would not for the loss of the fruit platter would depend on work as porters and Rashi says that the reason whether he was careless or not. However, the Nesevos (304, 1) rules used a horse and buggy delivery service to that this is only valid if the porter carried the transport the oil to its customer but the buggy maximum that he was able to bear but if the load got caught on something and consequentially was light, he is liable if he tripped. Pitim (304, 1), Avnei Choshen and Shoshanas He exonerated the delivery service because Yacov claim that this is only a minority opinion he maintained that the dispensation

Издание

Torah & Horaah

Дата

16 февраля 2024 г.

Страниц

3

Темы: health_mind