Об этом документе
Business Weekly — Ki Savo 5783
Выпуск: Business Weekly — Ki Savo 5783. Темы: не определены автоматически. THE WERDIGER EDITION BUSINESS WEEKLY RESTORING THE PRIMACY OF CHOSHEN MISHPAT UNDER THE AUSPICES OF HARAV CHAIM KOHN, SHLITA Issue #671 | Ki Savo | Sep 1, 2023 | 15 Elul 5783 לע״נ הרב יחיאל מיכל בן ר' משה אהרן אורליאן CASE FILE Rabbi Meir Orlian Writer for the Business Halacha Institute BHI HOTLINE לע"נ הרב אהרן בן הרב גדליהו ע"ה לע"נ ר' שלמה ב"ר ברוך וזוג' מרת רייכלה בת החבר יעקב הלוי ע"ה ווייל Q. the public, which we addressed ten years ago (Business Weekly #157, Naso 5773) in the article, THE WERDIGER EDITION - לע"נ הרה"ח ר' נחמי'ה בן הרה"ח ר' שלמה אלימלך ז"ל- DEDICATED BY HIS SON R’ SHLOME WERDIGER CASE FILE BHI HOTLINE “Public Passage” (Choshen Mishpat 377:1; 417:2). MONEY MATTERS MONEY MATTERS Yored L'sedei Chaveiro Applying all of the above to your case, since you had a mutual Property #10 agreement regarding the fine for late delivery, it would seem that Based on writings of Harav Chaim Kohn, shlita Worthwhile Services this situation should be governed by the halachah regarding a sale לע"נ ר' יחיאל מיכל ב"ר חיים וזוג' חי' בת ר' שמואל חיים ע"ה on credit, and if the storeowner has actual money, he should not be allowed to pay with shaveh kesef. Stein, “but I believe that his agreement all these decades shaveh kesef, because the lender knew that the money affords me rights that you should not ruin by was going to be used (Sma 101:1), and part of the chessed extending the building!” he does in extending the loan is to allow the borrower The two called Rabbi Dayan and asked: to repay with shaveh kesef if he does not have money. Furthermore, Rashbam and Rama in such a case, he may pay with shaveh kesef even if he has money, maintain that chezkas tashmishim also requires a claim of acquisition (Choshen Mishpat since this arrangement depends entirely on what the giver had in 153:2,13; Nesivos 140:19; Pischei Choshen, Nezikin 15:24). “Nonetheless, there are zoning laws that define how close to the property poskim (see Sefer Hamakneh 27:1[3], cited in Chiddushei Rabbi Akiva Eiger, line one can build, which must be adhered to because of dina d’malchusa and minhag Choshen Mishpat 241:7, and see Shach and Shaar Mishpat 101:1. 264:4) rules that if a person was imprisoned, and someone toiled no right to insist that he pay with money, because he may rely on the and expended money t
- Издание
- Business Weekly
- Дата
- 1 сентября 2023 г.
- Страниц
- 2